Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 5297 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $17.97 vs $279.28
- Up to 91% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-13700K - $0.08 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 33% better in Ready or Not than Phenom X4 9650 - 301 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 24 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
226
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €17.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6889 minutes ago
Buy for €279.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6890 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |