Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 5765 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $17.97 vs $246.11
- Up to 83% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-14700F - $0.15 vs $0.90 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 126% better in War Thunder than Phenom X4 9650 - 274 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 28 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
121
44%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €17.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7045 minutes ago
Buy for €246.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7045 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |