Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 1963 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $107.36 vs $169.73
- Up to 41% better value when playing Dead Space than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.74 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€119.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €119.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |