Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1599 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 9% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 178 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $87.67 vs $169.73
- Up to 53% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.55 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |