Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 1758 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 44% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 145 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $118.46 vs $169.73
- Up to 51% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.91 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€131.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €131.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Cezanne | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |