Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 2290 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 291 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - $169.73 vs $224.43
- Up to 5% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 7 7700X - $0.82 vs $0.86 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
291
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
95%
Price, €
€249.12
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €249.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
229
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raphael | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |