Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 32% better in New World than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 143 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing New World than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $1.01 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $99.89 vs $129.57
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€143.82
77%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €143.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4867 minutes ago
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4868 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |