Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3941 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Core i3-3210
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $63.06 vs $390.09
- Up to 70% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i9-14900K - $1.05 vs $3.48 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 87% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i3-3210 - 112 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 32 vs 4 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6887 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.48/FPS
30%
Price, €
€390.09
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6886 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |