Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3556 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Core i3-3210
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $56.81 vs $405.00
- Up to 77% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.36 vs $1.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 55 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 63% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3210 - 289 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 32 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
177
61%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
23%
Price, €
€449.55
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €449.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |