Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3941 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Core i3-3210
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $56.81 vs $338.95
- Up to 78% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.20 vs $0.90 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-3210 - 418 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 32 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
418
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
22%
Price, €
€376.23
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |