Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3380 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Core i3-3210
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - $56.81 vs $120.12
- Up to 35% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 7 5700X - $0.36 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 37% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3210 - 242 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
177
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
Buy for €133.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |