Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3380 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Core i3-3210
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700 - $63.06 vs $114.41
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 184% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3210 - 71 vs 25 FPS
- Up to 36% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3210 - $1.61 vs $2.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7071 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.41
55%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €114.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7071 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |