Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 390X outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 390X is 565 days older than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 390X - 15 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Performs up to 96% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Iris Plus Graphics 650 - 88 vs 45 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Radeon R9 390X
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
6.9 GPixel/s
10%
Texel Fillrate
55.2 GTexel/s
29%
Radeon R9 390X
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
67.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
184.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $429 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 8 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1050 MHz |
| 1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
