Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 854 days older than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 56% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Iris Plus Graphics 650 - 70 vs 45 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
6.9 GPixel/s
23%
Texel Fillrate
55.2 GTexel/s
53%
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |