Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 1183 days older than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 15 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 49% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Iris Plus Graphics 650 - 67 vs 45 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
6.9 GPixel/s
21%
Texel Fillrate
55.2 GTexel/s
43%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
