Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 250X outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 250X is 1055 days older than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250X - 15 vs 80 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250X
- Performs up to 9% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Iris Plus Graphics 650 - 49 vs 45 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Radeon R7 250X
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
6.9 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
55.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $99 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 1 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 950 MHz |
| 1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
