Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260 is 1113 days older than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Performs up to 18% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Iris Plus Graphics 650 - 53 vs 45 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
6.9 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
55.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |