Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1952 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €139.00 vs €1169.00
- Up to 82% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €1.05 vs €5.82 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 51% better in HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 201 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 120 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
133
66%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |