Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2238 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €139.00 vs €495.38
- Up to 49% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-14900K - €0.84 vs €1.65 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 81% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 300 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
166
55%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
300
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.65/FPS
51%
Price, €
€495.38
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €495.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |