Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1162 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €97.00 vs €1014.81
- Up to 90% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 9 5950X - €0.48 vs €4.68 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 217 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 105 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7502 minutes ago
Buy for €1,014.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7501 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |