Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1853 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €97.00 vs €392.14
- Up to 73% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i7-13700K - €0.61 vs €2.22 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 12% better in Halo Infinite than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 177 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
158
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7501 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.22/FPS
27%
Price, €
€392.14
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €392.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7501 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |