Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1526 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - €139.00 vs €414.73
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-12900KF - €0.89 vs €2.27 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 183 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
157
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
39%
Price, €
€414.73
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €414.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |