Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 3055 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 10% better in Valorant than Xeon W3520 - 751 vs 680 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 32 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
