Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1116 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Core i3-4160T - 198 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
