Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 606 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 181 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
