Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1067 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 181 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |