Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 514 days older than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen 7 3700U - 195 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
