Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1581 days older than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 15 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 7 3700U - 518 vs 517 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 12 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 85 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
