Key Differences
In short — Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Xeon W-3375 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core Ultra 9 185H is 868 days newer than Xeon W-3375.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3375
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core Ultra 9 185H - 76 vs 22 threads
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W-3375 - 151 vs 138 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3375 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon W-3375
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
Core Ultra 9 185H
Mobile • Dec 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3375 | vs | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ultra 9 |
| Ice Lake | Codename | METEOR LAKE |
| Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | Intel BGA 2049 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
38 | Cores | 16 |
76 | Threads | 22 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 270 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 128EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
