Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3375 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3375 is 2516 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3375
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 221 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 76 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3375 - 120 vs 270 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W-3375
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
928
51.872554499720515%
Multi-Core
5910
34.11452320480259%
Intel Xeon W-3375 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
38 | Cores | 12 |
76 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 270 W | TDP | 120 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
