Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3375 outperforms Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3375 is 2888 days newer than Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3375
- Performs up to 12% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Core i3-4130T - 149 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 76 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3375 - 35 vs 270 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3375 doesn't have integrated graphics
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-3375
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
909
50.810508664058126%
Multi-Core
1811
10.45370584160702%
Intel Xeon W-3375 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
38 | Cores | 2 |
76 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 270 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
