Buy on Amazon
€80
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3375 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3375 is 617 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3375
- Performs up to 11% better in Overwatch 2 than Athlon 3000G - 369 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 76 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3375 - 35 vs 270 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3375 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
333
90.2439024390244%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80
100%
Value Winner
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W-3375
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
53.49357182783678%
Multi-Core
1975
11.40036942969291%
Intel Xeon W-3375 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Athlon |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
38 | Cores | 2 |
76 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 270 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.