Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3375 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3375 is 1491 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3375
- Performs up to 17% better in Minecraft than EPYC 7551P - 738 vs 630 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD EPYC 7551P - 76 vs 64 threads
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3375 - 180 vs 270 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon W-3375
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Single-Core
895
50.02794857462269%
Multi-Core
6225
35.93280997460171%
Intel Xeon W-3375 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon W | Collection | EPYC |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
38 | Cores | 32 |
76 | Threads | 64 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 270 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
