Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon W-2125 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 975 days newer than Xeon W-2125.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon W-2125 - 169 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2125 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |