Key Differences
In short — Core i7-965 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-965 is 484 days older than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 80 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5645 - 168 vs 165 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |