Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2120 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-2120 is 341 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5645 - 169 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €62.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |