Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3536 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5645 - 266 vs 249 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |