Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2725 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5645 - 201 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€181.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €181.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |