Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2219 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-2670 - 146 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 54 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
115 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |