Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 is 635 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |