Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 is 231 days older than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Performs up to 9% better in League of Legends than FX-4300 - 61 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |