Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 91 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 144 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |