Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1425 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 220 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |