Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1983 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Sons Of The Forest than Xeon E5-1620 - 99 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 24 vs 8 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |