Buy on Amazon
€290.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2679 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1620 - 209 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 7 3800X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800x 4,5GHz AM4 36MB Cache Wraith Prism
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 7 3800X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
