Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i7-9700F

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i7-9700F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2051 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F

  • Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 134 vs 120 FPS
  • Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
This is a free version of A Plague Tale: Requiem.
A Plague Tale: Requiem

A Plague Tale: Requiem

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013


FPS

120

89%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i7-9700F Logo
Core i7-9700F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

134

100%

Value, €/FPS

€3.71/FPS

100%

Price, €

€496.71

100%

FPS and Value Winner

INTEL Core i7-9700F 8Core bis 4,7GHz ohne Prozessor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W

Buy for 496.71 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 191 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013

Intel Core i7-9700F Logo
Core i7-9700F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013


Single-Core

644

41%

Multi-Core

2356

37%

Intel Core i7-9700F Logo
Core i7-9700F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Single-Core

1549

100%

Multi-Core

6256

100%

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2

vs
Intel Core i7-9700F Logo

Intel Core i7-9700F

Sep 10th, 2013Release Date
Apr 23rd, 2019
Xeon E5CollectionCore i7
Ivy BridgeCodenameCoffee Lake
Intel Socket 2011SocketIntel Socket 1151
Server
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
8
8Threads8
3.7 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.0 GHz
3.9 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.7 GHz
130 WTDP
65 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
37.0x
Multiplier30.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.