Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1430 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 25% better in F1 23 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 203 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€351.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €351.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |