Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v3 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v3 is 1551 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 255 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 82 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
254
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €180.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |