Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1965 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 82 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 209 vs 186 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€209.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |