Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1914 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 55% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 45 vs 29 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
